Tuesday 9 October 2012

This Good News (9)

A Series of Questions about the Good News of the Kingdom of God


In this next section, I propose to ask and answer a series of important questions for our understanding and learning of the good news of the kingdom of God.  If you have read some of my other work either in print or in other parts of this blog, a lot of what I say will be familiar.  If you have not, might I suggest that you at least read my “Household of God” series in conjunction with this present material.

Questions like these: What is the kingdom of God?  What is the good news of the kingdom of God? What is proclaiming?  How was the good news proclaimed by Jesus, by the first disciples, by Paul?  When the good news was proclaimed, what response was being called for from those receiving the proclamation?  Does any of this have a bearing on what we do in the 21st century and how we do it?

Allow me a brief digression before we thrust into these questions.  A typically Western approach to life and to history is to see it as a linear sequence of events based on the passing of time.  In Western thought, the three most common pieces of information about an event are date, time and place.  A non-Western frame of reference, however, might be more interested in how the event fits with other more important (to the particular people involved) happenings or state of affairs.  A read of the Old Testament indicates events that happened relative to who was on the throne in Israel and (after the division of that nation) who was on the throne in Judah.

To us humans, past, present and future are entirely matters of perspective.  From a point in time (the ‘present’) a person looks back to the ‘past’ and forward to the ‘future’.  It’s the way we measure and count time, and it is the way we write history.  Simultaneous histories look at multiple historical lines of different groups of people or phenomena illustrating events that happened at the same time but in various places.

I am convinced that God’s view of history is not the typical Western one.  As I’ve said in other places, I think a better understanding of how God views history is 1) it is His story and 2) it is not a long continuous line of rope but a rope coil always and totally within His purview.  And this is my starting point for understanding the kingdom of God.

Arguably the most popular understanding of the idea of the kingdom of God is that it is a spiritual place “out there” somewhere where good people or ‘saved’ people go when they die.  To many, it is synonymous with ‘heaven’.  So: kingdom of God = kingdom of heaven = equals heaven.  To these people, heaven (aka the kingdom of God) is for people whose good behaviour outweighs their bad behaviour and who don’t belong to non-christian religions and who attend church and/or have a priest or pastor they are connected to.  This definition revolves entirely around us and who we are and how we live; we get to determine if we – and everybody else for that matter – are granted entry into the kingdom of God.

If you think back to the my earlier reference to the work of RenĂ© Padilla, you may recall the point made by a North American christian about the identification of United States culture with the christian religion to the extent that many citizens of that nation actually see them as synonymous.  In other words, the right and proper condition of the United States – citizens and government alike – is that of a christian cultural religion as defined by them.  And this United States (commonly called ‘American’) culture christianity is what has been preached and planted all over the world in my lifetime.

The 21st century is seeing, I believe, the result of the co-habitation of the concepts in these last two paragraphs.  American Culture Christianity now defines virtually all of the central items, concepts and tenets of modern christianity.  I call it the prostitution of christianity.  Although I have to admit that I don’t care for the term christianity: christianity is a religion, and Jesus and the first apostles stood squarely against religion in all its forms as the worship of idols, whether physical or intellectual.

Today, whether we like it or not, American Culture Christianity presumes to define church, the gospel, salvation, faith, repentance, born-again, heaven and hell, the kingdom of God, eternity, and much more – even most of our translations of the bible.  As far as I can figure, to arrive at their definitions, one has to either view the bible as less authoritative than their interpretations of the bible, or substitute words in the original languages of the bible so they can be translated according to the pre-determined outcome.

Let me say as emphatically as I can: the kingdom of God is NOT – I repeat NOT – heaven when you die.  That idea is an extreme over-simplification of the meaning of the idea Jesus talked about.  But for the grace of God, that over-simplification completely robs us of the truth that is the central tenet of the good news of Jesus.

Perhaps I can best express it like this: if you are standing looking at the idea of heaven-when-you-die as the kingdom of God, in order to see the truth, you do not glance slightly to your left or right, you do a complete 180° about-face.  God’s definition – and the bible’s definition I might add – is as far removed from this cultural definition as the east is from the west.  This cultural definition is not just different from, it is the antithesis of God’s definition.

In fact, the simplistic idea of heaven-when-you-die cannot be found in the New Testament.  It is generally preached by so-called evangelists as an extreme over-simplification of what Jesus talked about as recorded by John in his gospel, chapter fourteen.  It can be found in some English translations of the bible but it is mis-translation and deserves to be discarded – for reasons that we will come to now.
Chees,
Kevin.

No comments:

Post a Comment